Skip to main content

Jordan v. State

Citations

  • 343 S.W.3d 84
  • 2011 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 55
  • 2011 WL 221883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Thus, the materiality of the suppressed evidence must be evaluated within the context of the entire record as to how it impacts the innocence or guilt of the accused.”
  • \the defendant requested the state to disclose any Brady evidence\
  • relying on Strickler, 527 U.S. at 238 n.23

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLin, Tipton, Witt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.