State of Tennessee v. Jerry Reginald Burkes
Syllabus
The defendant, Jerry Reginald Burkes, appeals his convictions of money laundering, theft, and sales tax evasion and the accompanying 18-year effective sentence that included five years of confinement. The defendant argues that (1) the trial court erred by permitting the State to introduce certain evidence in violation of Tennessee Rule of Evidence 404(b) (2) the trial court erred by concluding that certain of the defendant's convictions would be admissible for purposes of Tennessee Rule of Evidence 609 (3) the trial court violated his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination (4) the State failed to discover and disclose exculpatory evidence (5) the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction of money laundering (6) the trial court erred by imposing a Range II sentence and (7) the sentence imposed by the trial court is illegal. Because the fiveyear term of confinement imposed by the trial court is not authorized, we vacate the sentencing decision of the trial court and remand the case for resentencing. Additionally, because the amount of restitution ordered by the trial court cannot be satisfied under the terms ordered by the trial court, we vacate the restitution order and remand the case for the trial court to impose restitution in a manner that complies with Code section 40-35- 304. We affirm the judgments of the trial court in all other respects.
Judges: Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.