Tennessee Supreme Court· 6/24/2010

State v. James

Citations

315 S.W.3d 440
2010 Tenn. LEXIS 570
2010 WL 2539649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “inference of knowledge that the property was stolen from the possession of recently stolen property is particularly suited to our current statute”
holding that the trial court acted within its discretionary authority -10- in establishing the procedure for juror questions notwithstanding the fact that the trial court permitted further cross-examination of a witness after juror questions had been posed
noting that federal courts have rejected the notion that the government has a duty to exclude every other hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt
noting that federal courts have rejected the notion that the government has a duty to exclude every other hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt
noting that federal courts have rejected the notion that the government has a duty to exclude every other hypothesis save that of the defendant's guilt
noting that federal courts have rejected the notion that the government has a duty to exclude every other hypothesis save that of the defendant's guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice Gary R. Wade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

219 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

83 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.