Shepp v. Shepp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The question whether we would find . . . benign advocacy of drug abuse or child prostitution were they presented as foundational religious beliefs is no question at all.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re N.C.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-10-10· cited 186×
• Jordan v. Jackson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-02· cited 35×
• Shepp v. Shepp
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-09-27· cited 20×
• In Re NC
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-10-10· cited 5×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reynolds v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1879-01-18· cited 1,827×
• Romer v. Evans
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-03· cited 1,427×
• McMillen v. McMillen
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-28· cited 137×
• Zummo v. Zummo
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-17· cited 91×
• Drum v. Shaull Equipment and Supply Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-07· cited 66×
• Morris v. Morris
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-05· cited 55×
• Espenshade v. Espenshade
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-05-06· cited 34×
• Rinehimer v. Rinehimer
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-12· cited 28×
• Tripathi v. Tripathi
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-11-15· cited 16×
• Boylan v. Boylan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-18· cited 12×
• Siliquini v. Kegel-Siliquini
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-11-09· cited 5×