Skip to main content

In re S.H.

Citations

  • 71 A.3d 973
  • 2013 Pa. Super. 165
  • 2013 WL 3366677
  • 2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a parent may petition the trial court “to regain custody of a child who is - 28 - J-A09020-25 the subject of an award of permanent legal custody”
  • “If events occur to eliminate the claim or controversy at any stage in the process, the [issue] becomes moot.”
  • “fundamental right of parents to the care and custody of their children when that care and custody serves the best interests of the children” (emphasis provided)
  • “the right to make decisions concerning the care, custody and control of one’s children is one of the oldest fundamental rights protected by the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution”
  • “the right to make decisions concerning the care, custody and control of one’s children is one of the oldest fundamental rights protected by the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution”
  • “This language does not confer or divest parents of any substantive rights but rather addresses the proper venue for visitation and support matters following the grant of a permanent legal custody arrangement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, Panelea, Panella, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.