Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 600 P.2d 247
  • 95 Nev. 613
  • 1979 Nev. LEXIS 628

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that where a defendant participates in the alleged error, he is estopped from raising any objection on appeal
  • recognizing that where a defendant participates in the alleged error, he is estopped from raising any objection on appeal
  • recognizing that where a defendant participates in the alleged error, he is estopped from raising any objection on appeal
  • recognizing that when a defendant participates in an alleged error, he is estopped from raising any objection on appeal
  • holding that the appellant was estopped from raising any objection on appeal regarding the admission of incriminating information because his attorney elicited the details of the incriminating information during cross- examination
  • holding that convictions of burglary and robbery did not violate double jeopardy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batjer, Mowbray, Thompson, Gunderson, Manoukian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.