Nevada Supreme Court· 7/29/1993
Stowe v. State
Citations
- 857 P.2d 15
- 109 Nev. 743
- 1993 Nev. LEXIS 113
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant cannot be convicted of both larceny and possession of stolen property for taking the same property
- discussing the specific intent required for burglary
- discussing the specific intent required for burglary
- discussing the specific intent required for burglary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Diomampo v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 68×
- Doyle v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-02-03· cited 33×
- Moore v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-01-19· cited 25×
- Hubbard v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2018-08-02· cited 15×
- HUBBARD (CORY) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2018-08-02
- Sullivan (Keith) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2020-11-24
- FLOWERS (NORMAN) VS. STATE C/W 55759Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-01-30
- ALVAREZ (JOHN) v. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2024-12-19
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-02-24· cited 600×
- Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 308×
- Jones v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1979-09-27· cited 33×
- Shepp v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1971-04-28· cited 27×
- Point v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1986-04-09· cited 19×
- SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA v. StevensNevada Supreme Court· 1981-06-25· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.