Jones v. DOLGENCORP, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant had failed to meet their burden when they disputed the plaintiffs estimated division of labor but failed to offer an alternative into evidence
• finding that the plaintiff “had no discretion over allocating the store’s labor-budget, which significantly influenced her assigning work hours to her staff’
• “[N]ot[ing] that [plaintiff] was sent to other Dollar General stores to help out not for her managerial skills, but for her manual labor, which included stocking, recovering, and purging the backroom.”
• denying, under similar factual circumstances, Defendant’s Motion to Strike

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).