Michael Woods v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two doctor’s notes excusing an employee from work failed to provide sufficient notice because they did not describe the employee’s condition
• holding that two doctor's notes excusing an employee from work failed to provide sufficient notice because they did not describe the employee's condition
• holding that two doctor's notes stating that employee was \advised to remain off work\ were inadequate because they did not mention the nature of the illness
• holding that two doctor’s notes stating that employee was “advised to remain off work” were inadequate because they did not mention the nature of the illness
• holding that two doctor’s notes excusing an employee from work failed to provide sufficient notice because they did not describe the employee’s condition
• holding that two doctor’s notes stating that employee was “advised to remain off work” were inadequate because they did not mention the nature of the illness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).