Donna Krenik v. County of Le Sueur

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court cannot sit as a \super-personnel department\
• holding that federal courts do not sit as a “super-personnel department”
• stating that a party opposing summary judgment “must demonstrate on the record the existence of specific facts which create a genuine issue for trial.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that “[s]kill includes such considerations as experience, training, education, and ability” and “Responsibility concerns the degree of accountability required in performing a job” (citation and quotations omitted)
• observing that the McDonnell Douglas framework applies to cases under the ADEA
• to survive Summary Judgment, plaintiff must provide evidence that the defendant’s proffered explanation is both incorrect and that discrimination is the true explanation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).