Jones v. CBE Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the defendant served the Rule 68 offer “long before” plaintiff had moved for class certification
• discussing various decisions in the context of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
• declining to certify class action under FDCPA where potential recovery was de minimis
• granting a motion to dismiss on mootness grounds
• “Because the letter received by the plaintiff was identical in all material respects to those received by other class members, the court finds the claims of the named plaintiff sufficiently typical of those of the putative class and the typicality requirement of Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(3) is met.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lucero v. Bureau of Collection Recovery, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-03-31· cited 88×
• Roble v. Celestica Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 2007-09-06· cited 64×
• Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
  Tenth Circuit· 2009-12-29· cited 35×
• Hartley v. Suburban Radiologic Consultants, Ltd.
  D. Minnesota· 2013-09-30· cited 19×
• Owens v. Hellmuth & Johnson, PLLC
  D. Minnesota· 2008-05-01· cited 15×
• Kalish v. Karp & Kalamotousakis, LLP
  S.D. New York· 2007-11-13· cited 13×
• Hernandez v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-06-27· cited 12×
• Johnson v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n
  D. Minnesota· 2011-06-29· cited 11×
• Tripp v. Berman & Rabin, P.A.
  D. Kansas· 2015-09-29· cited 11×
• Alberts v. Nash Finch Co.
  D. Minnesota· 2007-02-15· cited 9×
• Hicks v. Client Services, Inc.
  S.D. Florida· 2009-06-01· cited 8×
• Gallego v. Northland Group, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2015-04-27· cited 4×
• Ung v. Universal Acceptance Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 2016-06-03· cited 4×
• Lucero v. Bureau of Collection Recovery, Inc.
  D. New Mexico· 2010-05-06· cited 3×
• Warcholek v. Medical Collections System, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-11-02· cited 2×
• Vandehey v. Client Servs., Inc.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2019-06-07· cited 1×
• Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich
  N.D. Ohio· 2010-12-14· cited 1×
• Epps v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
  E.D. Arkansas· 2015-05-21· cited 1×
• Eufaula Drugs, Inc. v. TDI Managed Care Services, Inc.
  M.D. Alabama· 2008-06-25

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• City of Los Angeles v. Lyons
  Supreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,797×
• Hishon v. King & Spalding
  Supreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
• Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
• Powell v. McCormack
  Supreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 3,053×
• Natalia Makarova v. United States
  Second Circuit· 2000-01-12· cited 2,790×
• Sosna v. Iowa
  Supreme Court· 1975-01-14· cited 2,006×
• United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty
  Supreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 1,936×
• Weinstein v. Bradford
  Supreme Court· 1975-12-16· cited 1,702×
• Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,277×
• California v. LaRue
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-20· cited 833×
• Porous Media Corporation v. Pall Corporation
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-09-08· cited 755×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,265 Fred Zeidman and Steven Youngelson v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1981-07-27· cited 327×
• V S Limited Partnership, an Arkansas Limited Partnership v. Department of Housing and Urban Development United States of America
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-12-27· cited 281×
• William ALPERN and Russell D. Miller, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. UTILICORP UNITED, INC., Appellee
  Eighth Circuit· 1996-05-17· cited 226×
• Jeffrey L. Gammon, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Gc Services Limited Partnership
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-06-24· cited 222×
• Marceline M. DONALDSON and Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. the PILLSBURY COMPANY Et Al., Appellees
  Eighth Circuit· 1977-05-09· cited 203×
• Burton M. Abrams and Marguerite M. Abrams v. Interco Incorporated
  Second Circuit· 1983-09-28· cited 188×
• Claire Rand, Custodian for Brett Rand v. Monsanto Company
  Seventh Circuit· 1991-02-20· cited 180×
• Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1981-01-22· cited 172×
• Robert A. Holstein and Brian Grove, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-07-15· cited 99×