District of Columbia· 12/11/2008
Johnson v. United States
Citations
- 590 F. Supp. 2d 101
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102707
- 2008 WL 5265711
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing constitutional claims for damages against the BOP and federal officials sued in their official capacity
- dismissing constitutional claims for damages against the BOP and federal officials sued in their official capacity
- dismissing claim alleging violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242 because neither statute created private cause of action
- “It has been established that District of Columbia prisoners do not have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in parole and therefore have no protections under the due process clause with respect to parole determinations or procedures.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reggie B. Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chandler v. StoverDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-30· cited 7×
- Donnelly v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2012-03-30· cited 6×
- Hammond v. D.C. Record CenterDistrict of Columbia· 2009-01-22· cited 3×
- Rossmann v. LeaderDistrict of Columbia· 2013-12-02
- Rious v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict of Columbia· 2016-05-03
- Hill v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict of Columbia· 2017-06-02
- Hill v. Wilson SmootDistrict of Columbia· 2018-03-29
- Redmond v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict of Columbia· 2019-09-04
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 15,294×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 11,385×
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 4,909×
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court· 1994-02-23· cited 4,884×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-02-22· cited 3,633×
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 3,342×
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 3,299×
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court· 1983-04-26· cited 3,076×
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court· 1997-05-19· cited 2,485×
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court· 1992-02-25· cited 1,691×
- Settles v. United States Parole CommissionD.C. Circuit· 2005-11-08· cited 586×
- GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2000-01-11· cited 485×
- First Chicago International v. United Exchange Co., Ltd.First Circuit· 1988-01-19· cited 397×
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BenderD.C. Circuit· 1997-09-23· cited 361×
- Yamaha Corporation of America v. United States of AmericaD.C. Circuit· 1992-07-16· cited 344×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.