Supreme Court of Georgia· 6/30/2008
Ruffin v. State
Citations
- 284 Ga. 52
- 663 S.E.2d 189
- 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 2188
- 2008 Ga. LEXIS 550
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing, as examples, a defendant “going on the lam to avoid prosecution, filing a series of frivolous pretrial motions, or securing the unavailability of a critical prosecution witness”
- trial court’s grant or denial of a motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds is reviewed for abuse of discretion only
- “Release on bond does not absolve the State of its constitutional obligation to bring those accused of committing crimes to trial in a speedy manner.”
- one year marks the point where deliberateness in prosecuting a crime turns generally into presumptively prejudicial delay
- appellant must be “dogged” in the assertion of his speedy trial rights
- delay of two years, two months, and twenty-three days was presumptively prejudicial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sears
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
155 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ruffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-06-30· cited 137×
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-02-07· cited 120×
- State v. PickettSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-02-28· cited 103×
- Sosniak v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-11-19· cited 77×
- State v. BucknerSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-02-04· cited 57×
- State v. RiggsSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-05-01· cited 57×
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-06-15· cited 49×
- Rafi v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-09-12· cited 38×
- Phan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-02-27· cited 36×
- Weis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-03-25· cited 33×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-09-22· cited 30×
- Brewington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-02-07· cited 30×
- Shelton R. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-04-10· cited 30×
- Bowling v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-02-09· cited 29×
- Sweatman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-10-04· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-04-16· cited 27×
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2020-10-19· cited 27×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-11-05· cited 26×
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-03-09· cited 25×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-11-21· cited 25×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 5,659×
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 3,756×
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1967-03-13· cited 1,817×
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court· 1966-02-23· cited 1,196×
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court· 1969-01-20· cited 1,132×
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court· 1982-03-31· cited 917×
- Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-05-25· cited 824×
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court· 1978-05-01· cited 806×
- United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court· 1986-03-03· cited 786×
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-02-25· cited 744×
- Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 675×
- Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 594×
- United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 559×
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 527×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-06-08· cited 429×
- Dillingham v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 322×
- Fleming v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1977-11-08· cited 184×
- Boseman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1994-01-24· cited 143×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.