Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 885 S.W.2d 641
  • 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 2576
  • 1994 WL 568657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]lthough more than sufficient in the discussion of the sufficiency of the evidence, the brief fails to present an adequate ‘professional evaluation’ of the record . . . .”
  • rejecting Anders brief with thorough description of evidence
  • interlocutory order discussing procedures for Anders appeals
  • interlocutory orders on Anders briefs
  • discussing procedures for Anders appeals
  • discussing procedures for Anders appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Cummings, Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

329 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.