In Re Schulman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that court of appeals will not grant motion on Anders brief without reviewing record carefully
• noting that Anders brief accompanies motion to withdraw as assurance to appellate court that attorney has made a thorough and conscientious examination of record
• noting that Anders brief accompanies motion to withdraw as assurance to appellate court that attorney has made a thorough and conscientious examination of record
• stating that court of appeals, after deciding that colorable claims for appeal exist, will abate case and remand for appointment of new attorney with directions to file merits brief
• stating that “[i]n Texas, an Anders brief need not specifically advance ‘arguable’ points of error if counsel finds none, but it must provide record references to the facts and procedural history and set out pertinent legal authorities”
• stating that “[i]n Texas, an Anders brief need not specifically advance ‘arguable’ points of error if counsel finds none, but it must provide record references to the facts and procedural history and set out pertinent legal authorities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).