Skip to main content

Meza v. State

Citations

  • 206 S.W.3d 684
  • 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1822
  • 2006 WL 2686519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in some instances, it is appropriate for trial court to exercise the authority to appoint or substitute counsel following abatement and remand
  • holding that, in some instances, it is appropriate for trial court to exercise the authority to appoint or substitute counsel following abatement and remand
  • stating that appellate counsel filing Anders brief and motion to withdraw must provide notice to client satisfying these three \educational burdens\
  • noting that a memorandum 3 opinion agreeing with appellate counsel that there are no non-frivolous issues in the case is acceptable in an Anders appeal
  • noting Bledsoe’s holding that a memorandum opinion suffices in an Anders case when an appellate court agrees that the appeal is frivolous
  • approving use of unpublished memorandum opinion in context of Anders brief with which court of appeals agrees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

461 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Meza v. State

14 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.