Meza v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in some instances, it is appropriate for trial court to exercise the authority to appoint or substitute counsel following abatement and remand
• holding that, in some instances, it is appropriate for trial court to exercise the authority to appoint or substitute counsel following abatement and remand
• stating that appellate counsel filing Anders brief and motion to withdraw must provide notice to client satisfying these three \educational burdens\
• noting that a memorandum 3 opinion agreeing with appellate counsel that there are no non-frivolous issues in the case is acceptable in an Anders appeal
• noting Bledsoe’s holding that a memorandum opinion suffices in an Anders case when an appellate court agrees that the appeal is frivolous
• approving use of unpublished memorandum opinion in context of Anders brief with which court of appeals agrees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).