Caraway v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he defendant must be advised that he has a right to file a pro se brief and that he has a right to personally review the appellate record for that purpose.”
• \[T]he defendant must be advised that he has a right to file a pro se brief and that he has a right to personally review the appellate record for that purpose.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kelly, Sylvester
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-06-25· cited 3,246×
• Johnson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1994-10-19· cited 607×
• State Ex Rel. McCoy v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1987-04-09· cited 7×
• Sebastian Rangel v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-10-04
• Justin Tiger Thomas v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2012-03-15
• Armando Ochoa v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-05-12

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Currie v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-12-18· cited 2,837×
• McMahon v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-10-08· cited 63×
• Hawkins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-10-09· cited 24×