Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 4/26/2001
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 47 S.W.3d 701
- 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 2708
- 2001 WL 421917
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[s]ubstantial compliance with [Rule 25.2(b)(3)] is sufficient to confer jurisdiction\ and \judgment notation and the docket entry constitute[d] substantial compliance sufficient to confer jurisdiction\ on court of appeals
- “[s]ub-stantial compliance with [Rule 25.2(b)(3)] is sufficient to confer jurisdiction” and “judgment notation and the docket entry constitute[d] substantial compliance sufficient to confer jurisdiction” on court of appeals
- \Defendant gave written notice of appeal as to motion to suppress only \
- “Defendant gave written notice of appeal as to motion to suppress only ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maurice Amidei
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-09-11· cited 48×
- Pool v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-12-15· cited 34×
- Gonzalez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-11-29· cited 32×
- Johnson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-08-18· cited 22×
- Luera v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2001-12-28· cited 12×
- James v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-01-29· cited 8×
- Lajonte James v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-11-07
- Ronnie Douglas Hubbert v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-06-26
- John Benjamin Pool v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-12-15
- Johnson, Ronald v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-08-18
- Johns, Jimmy EugeneCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-07-07
- Johns, Jimmy EugeneCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-06-25
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 2,122×
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,253×
- Muniz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-01-06· cited 1,228×
- McNairy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 330×
- Joseph v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-09-23· cited 226×
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-09-26· cited 83×
- Riley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-29· cited 80×
- Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-10-07· cited 54×
- Flores v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1995-02-22· cited 39×
- Munera v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1998-03-11· cited 30×
- Miller v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-12-30· cited 17×
- Gomes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-01-13· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.