Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 732 S.W.2d 817
  • 292 Ark. 632
  • 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence of the appellant’s behavior subsequent to the crime should have been considered as a mitigating factor.
  • evidence of the appellant's behavior subsequent to the crime should have been considered as a mitigating factor.
  • in a rape case, an expert can offer an opinion that a child has been sexually abused
  • where error in allowing | n improper opinion testimony, but held harmless in the face of overwhelming evidence
  • upholding statute similar to V.R.E. 804a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newbern, Purtle, Dudley, Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.