Skip to main content

Dixon v. State

Citations

  • 545 S.W.2d 606
  • 260 Ark. 857
  • 1977 Ark. LEXIS 2187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim of error unsupported by citation to authority or convincing argument will be considered on appeal only if it is apparent without further research that the argument is well taken
  • holding that the court will not research the law for an appellant
  • stating that “[i]n effect the court is asked to research the law and to hold in favor of the appellant if the result of our labor so demands. We must decline that invitation”
  • stating, \In effect the court is asked to research the law and to hold in favor of the appellant if the result of our labor so demands. We must decline that invitation.\
  • stating, “In effect the court is asked to research the law and to hold in favor of the appellant if the result of our labor so demands. We must decline that invitation.”
  • assignments of error presented by counsel in their brief, unsupported by convincing argument or authority, will not be considered on appeal unless it is apparent without further research that they are well taken

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: George Rose Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

144 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.