Wildermuth v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding jury likely assumed procedure was used to reduce trauma any child might suffer through public testimony
• discussing common law and constitutional implications of defendant’s presence at trial
• court applies Ohio v. Roberts test in upholding statute allowing closed circuit television testimony of child victims of sexual abuse
• court applies Ohio v. Roberts test in upholding statute allowing closed circuit television testimony of child victims of sexual abuse
• “expert testimony may not be essential;” testimony of parent, combined with the child’s own testimony and judicial observation of the child, may suffice
• personal observation by the judge should be the rule rather than the exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).