Supreme Court· 6/30/1986
Thornburg v. Gingles
Citations
- 478 U.S. 30
- 106 S. Ct. 2752
- 92 L. Ed. 2d 25
- 1986 U.S. LEXIS 121
- 54 U.S.L.W. 4877
- 4 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1082
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district court is permitted, on the basis of all relevant circumstances, to \view[ ] with some caution\ black candidates' success in election held after filing of lawsuit
- holding that vote dilution claims under the Voting Rights Act must be supported by a threshold level of numerical substantiality
- holding that district court is permitted, on the basis of all relevant circumstances, to “view[ ] with some caution” black candidates’ success in election held after filing of lawsuit
- recognizing that no particular number of factors need be proved, but that Sec. 2 analysis instead depends on a searching practical evaluation of past and present reality and on a functional view of the political process
- noting that crossover voting in favor of minority candidates is more common when minority incumbents stand for reelection
- noting that crossover voting in favor of minority candidates is more common when minority incumbents stand for reelection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brennan Announced the Judgment of the Court And
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
787 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesSecond Circuit· 2006-12-07· cited 2,764×
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court· 2009-03-09· cited 2,505×
- Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinFourth Circuit· 1992-11-24· cited 1,890×
- Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court· 2013-01-09· cited 1,353×
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 1,107×
- Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesSecond Circuit· 2006-01-11· cited 773×
- Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 739×
- Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 626×
- Chisom v. RoemerSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 483×
- Growe v. EmisonSupreme Court· 1993-02-23· cited 465×
- Burton v. City of Belle GladeEleventh Circuit· 1999-06-25· cited 430×
- Bush v. VeraSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 398×
- Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court· 2004-04-28· cited 394×
- Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court· 1993-03-02· cited 379×
- Shaw v. HuntSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 323×
- League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. North CarolinaFourth Circuit· 2014-10-01· cited 302×
- Mixon v. OhioSixth Circuit· 1999-09-30· cited 301×
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. PerrySupreme Court· 2006-06-28· cited 297×
- Holder v. HallSupreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 296×
- Cooper v. HarrisSupreme Court· 2017-05-22· cited 259×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 2,420×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 1,327×
- City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court· 1980-04-22· cited 783×
- White v. RegesterSupreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 771×
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-02-19· cited 768×
- Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 658×
- Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-02-24· cited 541×
- Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1966-04-25· cited 476×
- Rogers v. LodgeSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 451×
- City of Rome v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 419×
- Charles F. Zimmer, Stewart Marshall, Intervenor-Appellant v. John J. McKeithenFifth Circuit· 1973-09-12· cited 411×
- Fortson v. DorseySupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 383×
- United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 364×
- East Carroll Parish School Board v. MarshallSupreme Court· 1976-03-08· cited 336×
- United States v. Marengo County CommissionEleventh Circuit· 1984-05-14· cited 195×
- Nevett v. SidesFifth Circuit· 1978-03-29· cited 132×
- Henry J. Kirksey, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Board of Supervisors of Hinds County, Mississippi, DefendantsFifth Circuit· 1977-07-25· cited 120×
- Graves v. BarnesW.D. Texas· 1972-01-28· cited 87×
Other cases named Thornburg v. Gingles
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.