Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/23/1979

Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

277 N.W.2d 208
1979 Minn. LEXIS 1447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “[e]xaetitude is not required of the trial court in the valuation of assets in a dissolution proceeding”
noting that \[e]xactitude is not required of the trial court in the valuation of assets in a dissolution proceeding\
noting that the district court \expressly considered the efforts expended by appellant in acquiring the Arizona property subsequent to commencement of the dissolution proceeding and awarded appellant the entire interest in that property\
stating that “[e]xactitude is not required of the trial court in the valuation of assets in a dissolution proceeding; it is only necessary that the value arrived at lies within a reasonable range of figures”
finding no error in trial court's refusal to consider tax consequences \where no evidence on the issue was presented at trial\
finding no error in trial court’s refusal to consider tax consequences “where no evidence on the issue was presented at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Todd, Wahl, Otis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.