Cozik v. Cozik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court’s property award to wife held excessive where husband contributed substantially more to property acquisition
• where the Minnesota Supreme Court stated “[ujnless there has been an overt act which can be called contempt in itself, when the amounts in default are paid there is no longer any ground for a finding of contempt because if there was one it has been purged by the payment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).