Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/1/1979
Aaron v. Aaron
Citations
- 281 N.W.2d 150
- 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1539
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that if potential liability is too speculative, it should not be considered in the distribution of marital property
- although within trial court’s discretion to consider tax consequences of award, no abuse of discretion for trial court to refuse to speculate about potential tax consequences of future sale of marital real estate
- although within trial court's discretion to consider tax consequences of award, no abuse of discretion for trial court to refuse to speculate about potential tax consequences of future sale of marital real estate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Yetka, Sheran, Yet-Ka, Scott, Otis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Melvyn Bell, Darlene Bell, Bell Holdings, Inc., Bell Equities, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1997-03-20· cited 124×
- In Re the Marriage of O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-27· cited 44×
- Maurer v. MaurerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-03-22· cited 43×
- Leftwich v. LeftwichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-02-05· cited 42×
- Marriage of Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-06-29· cited 36×
- Marriage of Salstrom v. SalstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-04-21· cited 23×
- In Re the Marriage of BergCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-05-20· cited 19×
- Crooker v. CrookerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-08-07· cited 18×
- Marriage of Brockman v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-09-10· cited 15×
- In Re the Marriage of HayCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-12-26· cited 12×
- Marriage of Balogh v. BaloghCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-09-25· cited 12×
- In Re the Marriage of Helland v. HellandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-09-18· cited 11×
- Marriage of Fastner v. FastnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-07-26· cited 9×
- In re the Marriage of: Christine J. Curtis v. Gregory M. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-11-16· cited 9×
- Marriage of Nolan v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-08-28· cited 8×
- Maurer v. MaurerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-05-16· cited 7×
- Marriage of Hattstrom v. HattstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-04-15· cited 6×
- Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-05-28· cited 5×
- Marriage of Reynolds v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-03-30· cited 5×
- Kriesel v. GustafsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-03-08· cited 4×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-08-19· cited 150×
- Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-12-30· cited 97×
- Weinberg v. WeinbergCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-10-30· cited 91×
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-03-23· cited 72×
- Burkhart v. BurkhartIndiana Court of Appeals· 1976-06-29· cited 43×
- Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-05-14· cited 39×
- In Re the Marriage of GoldsteinArizona Supreme Court· 1978-09-11· cited 23×
- Podany v. PodanySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-06-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.