Skip to main content
· 4/20/1984

Sharp v. Laubersheimer

Citations

  • 347 N.W.2d 268
  • 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that recovery based on an unjust-enrichment theory was “in essence . . . an award in quantum meruit”
  • reversing award of unjust enrichment or quantum meruit theory recovery because an express contract on the same subject existed
  • equating unjust enrichment with quantum meruit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.