· 4/20/1984
Sharp v. Laubersheimer
Citations
- 347 N.W.2d 268
- 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that recovery based on an unjust-enrichment theory was “in essence . . . an award in quantum meruit”
- reversing award of unjust enrichment or quantum meruit theory recovery because an express contract on the same subject existed
- equating unjust enrichment with quantum meruit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peterson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.