National Bank of Arizona v. Thruston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that while a party may point to discovery to show there is no evidence to support a claim, “conclusory statements will not suffice”
• stating conclusory statements will not suffice, but that the movant must point to relevant evidentiary materials
• “[A] court must view the [summary judgment] evidence in a light most favorable to the non-moving party and draw all justifiable inferences in its favor.”
• when the moving party meets its initial burden, then the nonmoving party must address overlooked evidence or explain why the moving party’s motion lacks merit
• the movant must demonstrate there is insufficient evidence in the record of any affirmative defense before being entitled to summary judgment
• party opposing a summary judgment motion must produce evidence establishing a genuine issue of material fact once the moving party satisfies its initial burden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).