Skip to main content

Johnson v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 712 S.E.2d 751
  • 58 Va. App. 625
  • 2011 Va. App. LEXIS 259

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Making one specific argument on an issue does not preserve a separate legal point on the same issue for review.” (quoting Edwards v. Commonwealth, 41 Va. App. 752, 760 (2003) (en banc))
  • expressing unwillingness to “judicially graft” requirements into statutes “under the subtle ‘guise of judicial interpretation’” (first quoting Cent. Va. Obstetrics & Gynecology Assocs., P.C. v. Whitfield, 42 Va. App. 264, 280 (2004
  • “‘Making one specific argument on an issue does not preserve a separate legal point on the same issue for review.’” (quoting Edwards v. Commonwealth, 41 Va. App. 752, 760, 589 S.E.2d 444, 448 (2003) (en banc))
  • “We can only administer the law as it is written.” (quoting Uninsured Emplrs. Fund v. Wilson, 46 Va.App. 500, 506, 619 S.E.2d 476, 479 (2005))
  • “‘We can only administer the law as it is written.’” (quoting Uninsured Emp’rs Fund v. Wilson, 46 Va. App. 500, 506, 619 S.E.2d 476, 479 (2005))
  • “ ‘We can only administer the law as it is written.’ ” (quoting Uninsured Emp’rs Fund v. Wilson, 46 Va.App. 500, 506, 619 S.E.2d 476, 479 (2005))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelsey, Petty, Beales

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.