Christina M. Mollenhauer v. Commonwealth of Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining commissioners court's order recitals and contract provision in determining whether expenditures were to be paid from currently available funds
• discussing the commissioners court’s budgetary discretion with respect to “grave public necessity”
• “[T]he appropriation made by the amendment was within an object (election expense) of the budget as originally adopted.”
• \[T]he appropriation made by the amendment was within an object (election expense) of the budget as originally adopted.\
• “[T]he appropriation made by the amendment was within an object (election expense) of the budget as originally adopted.”
• examining conunissioners (continued...) Ms. Martha Galarza - Page 5 (GA-0652

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).