Perry v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if the factual record supports the determination, a judgment may be upheld on any basis apparent in the record
• holding that the right-result-different-reason doctrine is inapplicable when “additional factual presentation is necessary to resolve the newly-advanced reason”
• holding that an appellate court may properly affirm where the lower court reached the correct result but assigned a different reason for its holding, as long as additional findings of fact are not necessary
• providing that an appellate court can affirm a judgment for any reason supported by the record
• providing that an appellate court can affirm a judgment for any reason supported by the record
• explaining that this Court may rely on any ground to affirm a judgment, as long as that ground does not require additional factual development

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).