Hamilton v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a conviction where a single eyewitness to a mob attack testified that the defendant’s actions toward the victim reflected “something other than rendering assistance,” contradicting the defendant’s theory of the case
• affirming a conviction where a single eyewitness to a mob attack testified that the defendant’s actions toward the victim reflected “something other than rendering assistance,” contradicting the defendant’s theory of the case
• noting gang expert testimony that “Bloods wear . . . red”
• “The fact finder, who has the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses, has the sole responsibility to determine their credibility” as well as “the weight to be given their testimony.” (quoting Commonwealth v. -6- Taylor, 256 Va. 514, 518 (1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).