Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 9/25/1980

Johnson & Johnson v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.

Citations

  • 631 F.2d 186
  • 208 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 169
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that plaintiff show “a logical causal connection between the alleged false advertising and its own sales position”
  • distinguishing a damages claim, from injunctive relief, because it “would require more proof”
  • “[A] plaintiff seeking an injunction, as opposed to money damages, need not quantify the losses actually borne.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumbard, Mansfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

125 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Johnson & Johnson v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.