CGS Industries, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing the underlying complaint “liberally” and explaining that exclusions “must be read narrowly” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• “[E]xclusions are subject to strict construction and must be read narrowly.” (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Auto Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Cook, 850 N.E.2d 1152, 1156 (N.Y. 2006))
• “Since ‘title’ is not defined in the Web Xtend Policy, and no New York court has authoritatively determined its scope, in addition to its use in federal law, use of a dictionary is instructive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).