Skip to main content
· 10/4/1984

Ppx Enterprises, Inc., Mod Music, Inc., and J.H. Records, Inc. v. Audiofidelity, Inc. And Dante J. Pugliese

Citations

  • 746 F.2d 120
  • 224 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 340
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17947

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court was bound to accept stipulated facts in deciding motion for summary judgment
  • observing that “[e]very time a record in which [plaintiffs] have a royalty interest is sold, they earn money; every time a sale is lost to a competitor, they lose potential profit”
  • “straightforward commercial interests” when defendant’s sales directly reduced sales by plaintiffs licensees and netted plaintiff fewer royalties
  • “Of course, the parties may not create a case by stipulating to facts which do not really exist.”
  • the plaintiffs claimed to have a financial interest in sales of Jimi Hendrix recordings and claims that the defendants were marketing albums falsely claiming to contain Hendrix performances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Pratt, Kelleher, Central, California

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.