Ninth Circuit· 9/4/2014
John Doe I v. Nestle, USA
Citations
- 766 F.3d 1013
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17429
- 2014 WL 4358453
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a violation of the “prohibition against slavery” gives rise to a claim under the ATS
- finding that prohibition of slavery is a universal norm of international law
- granting plaintiffs leave to amend their pleadings to allege that some of the activity underlying their ATS claim took place in the United States
- stating that “the absence of decisions finding corporations liable does not imply that corporate liability is a legal impossibility under international law ... and ... that the lack of decisions holding corporations liable could be explained by strategic considerations”
- remanding with instructions to allow plaintiffs to amend their complaint in light of relevant cases decided while an appeal was pending
- stating that “the absence of decisions finding corporations liable does not imply that corporate liability is a legal impossibility under international law . . . and . . . that the lack of decisions holding corporations liable could be explained by strategic considerations”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Wardlaw, Rawlinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Luis Mujica v. Airscan Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2014-11-12· cited 114×
- Jane Doe v. Drummond Company, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2015-03-25· cited 84×
- Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLCSupreme Court· 2018-04-24· cited 70×
- In Re Arab Bank, PLC Alien Tort Statute LitigationSecond Circuit· 2015-12-08· cited 49×
- Ramchandra Adhikari v. Daoud & Partners, etFifth Circuit· 2017-01-03· cited 42×
- Sundus Saleh v. George BushNinth Circuit· 2017-02-10· cited 40×
- Auto Ind. Pension Trust Fund v. Toshiba Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2018-07-17· cited 33×
- Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation SocietyW.D. Washington· 2015-12-21· cited 30×
- John Doe I v. Exxon Mobil CorpDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-24· cited 23×
- McCoy v. Nestle USA, Inc.N.D. California· 2016-03-29· cited 16×
- Doe I v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2023-07-07· cited 12×
- John Doe v. Nestle, S.A.Ninth Circuit· 2018-10-23· cited 8×
- Dana v. Hershey Co.N.D. California· 2016-03-29· cited 7×
- Estate of Alvarez v. Johns Hopkins UniversityD. Maryland· 2017-08-30· cited 6×
- Tayo Daramola v. Oracle America, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2024-02-06· cited 6×
- Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Tech., Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2017-06-28· cited 5×
- Doe v. Nestle USA, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2015-05-06· cited 5×
- In re Arab Bank, PLC Alien Tort Statute LitigationSecond Circuit· 2016-05-09· cited 4×
- Adhikari v. Daoud & PartnersS.D. Texas· 2015-03-24· cited 1×
- Salim v. MitchellE.D. Washington· 2017-08-07· cited 1×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceNinth Circuit· 2009-07-16· cited 3,161×
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 1,211×
- Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court· 2004-06-29· cited 1,133×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1991-03-26· cited 770×
- Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Supreme Court· 2013-04-17· cited 438×
- Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Second Circuit· 2010-09-17· cited 417×
- The Paquete HabanaSupreme Court· 1899-11-06· cited 377×
- Dolly M. E. Filartiga and Joel Filartiga v. Americo Norberto Pena-IralaSecond Circuit· 1980-06-30· cited 367×
- Aziz v. Alcolac, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2011-09-19· cited 322×
- Hanoch Tel-Oren, in His Capacity as Father, on Behalf of the Deceased, Imry Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab Republic Hanoch Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab RepublicD.C. Circuit· 1984-02-03· cited 311×
- Abagninin v. Amvac Chemical Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2008-09-24· cited 254×
- Romero v. Drummond Co., Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2008-12-22· cited 215×
- Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman EnergySecond Circuit· 2009-10-02· cited 201×
- Seven Arts Filmed Entertainmen v. Content Media Corporation PlcNinth Circuit· 2013-11-06· cited 201×
- United States v. Alfredo Gracidas-UlibarryNinth Circuit· 2000-11-07· cited 188×
- In Re Estate Of Ferdinand MarcosNinth Circuit· 1994-06-16· cited 159×
- Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2011-07-08· cited 108×
- Khulumani v. Barclay National Bank Ltd.Second Circuit· 2007-10-12· cited 101×
Other cases named John Doe I v. Nestle, USA
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.