Tayo Daramola v. Oracle America, Inc.

Oral argument

• Argued

  38 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that exigent circumstances justified the warrantless seizure of a package due to the “risk of the package’s disappearance before a warrant could be obtained,” even though in hindsight it may have “appear[ed] that the risk of the package’s disappearance was small”
• A canine positively alerting to contraband creates “full probable cause” and “a stronger basis for detention of the package than in Van Leeuwen.”
• “‘[T]he decision by governmental authorities to exert dominion and control over the package for their own purposes clearly constituted a ‘seizure’ . . . .’”
• actions of police officer in detaining suspicious package which had been mailed to a university student and which package was in custody of the university was a seizure of the package, but did not violate Fourth Amendment
• mailed package received at dormitory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).