Skip to main content
· 9/2/1994

Bd. of Educ. of Carlsbad v. Harrell

Citations

  • 882 P.2d 511
  • 118 N.M. 470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under compulsory arbitration statutes due process is satisfied by substantial evidence review of findings of fact and de novo review of questions of law
  • holding that a provision of the State Personnel Act limiting judicial review in an appeal from a school board’s decision to discharge a certified employee was unconstitutional
  • holding that a provision of the State Personnel Act limiting judicial review in an appeal from a school board’s decision to discharge a certified employee was unconstitutional
  • holding that a suspension with pay does not violate any recognized property interest
  • holding that substantial evidence review of the 16 findings of fact and de novo review of questions of law satisfy due process under 17 compulsory arbitration statutes
  • holding that a suspension with pay does not violate any recognized property interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baca, Frost, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.