Skip to main content
· 12/27/2006

Contreras v. WALGREENS DRUG STORE NO. 3837

Citations

  • 149 P.3d 761
  • 214 Ariz. 137
  • 495 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 26
  • 2006 Ariz. App. LEXIS 164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is insufficient . . . to demonstrate that spills of some kind regularly occur; the business must be able to reasonably anticipate that a condition hazardous to customers will regularly occur.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brammer, Eckstrstom, Espinosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.