Skip to main content
· 11/22/2011

SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. Partnership

Citations

  • 265 P.3d 1070
  • 228 Ariz. 271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a quitclaim deed “conveys any interest the grantor possesses in the property, but neither warrants nor claims that title is valid”
  • vacating damages because, although the party’s disclosure statements referred to generally related things, it never revealed the amount of damages it would seek
  • vacating damages award because the plaintiff disclosed it was seeking “rent” and the value of the “right to use” but not “that it would claim $765 a month in damages”
  • “A quit claim deed conveys to the grantee no greater rights to the property conveyed than the grantor possessed . . . .”
  • punitive damages may be awarded in higher amount against employer to encourage employer’s close control over employees
  • where a party’s tactics, including 14 its assertion of a provocative counterclaim, “ignited litigation flames that scorched the 15 earth,” that party “ha[d] only itself to blame” for substantial fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnsen, Brown, Gemmill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.