Skip to main content
· 6/11/1993

CR by Dunn v. the Travelers

Citations

  • 626 A.2d 588
  • 426 Pa. Super. 92
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • presuming that proper restriction on face of draft would have prevented negotiation
  • stating “[t]he objective of a civil contempt proceeding is remedial and judicial sanctions are employed to coerce the defendant into compliance with the court’s order....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Kelly and Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.