· 6/11/1993
CR by Dunn v. the Travelers
Citations
- 626 A.2d 588
- 426 Pa. Super. 92
- 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1924
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- presuming that proper restriction on face of draft would have prevented negotiation
- stating “[t]he objective of a civil contempt proceeding is remedial and judicial sanctions are employed to coerce the defendant into compliance with the court’s order....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olszewski, Kelly and Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.