Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 2/21/2024

Jane Doe v. Cenk Sidar

Citations

  • 93 F.4th 241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that non-anonymity orders are immediately 27 USCA4 Appeal: 24-1900 Doc: 53 Filed: 04/22/2026 Pg: 28 of 28 appealable under collateral order doctrine
  • explaining that use of “fictitious names” is favored “when necessary to protect the privacy” of minors (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • explaining that the use of “fictitious names” is favored “when necessary to protect the privacy” of minor victims (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)
  • explaining that the use of “fictitious names” is favored “when necessary to protect the privacy” of minor victims (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)
  • describing that the claims involving a plaintiff’s “sexual assault and resulting psychological trauma” are beyond “merely sensitive” and that courts have recognized a plaintiff’s “interest in preserving privacy where allegations concern sexual assault”
  • applying these “five nonexhaustive factors” and reversing district court’s grant of motion to remove pseudonym (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Jane Doe v. Cenk Sidar

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.