Fourth Circuit· 2/21/2024
Jane Doe v. Cenk Sidar
Citations
- 93 F.4th 241
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that non-anonymity orders are immediately 27 USCA4 Appeal: 24-1900 Doc: 53 Filed: 04/22/2026 Pg: 28 of 28 appealable under collateral order doctrine
- explaining that use of “fictitious names” is favored “when necessary to protect the privacy” of minors (internal quotation marks omitted)
- explaining that the use of “fictitious names” is favored “when necessary to protect the privacy” of minor victims (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)
- explaining that the use of “fictitious names” is favored “when necessary to protect the privacy” of minor victims (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)
- describing that the claims involving a plaintiff’s “sexual assault and resulting psychological trauma” are beyond “merely sensitive” and that courts have recognized a plaintiff’s “interest in preserving privacy where allegations concern sexual assault”
- applying these “five nonexhaustive factors” and reversing district court’s grant of motion to remove pseudonym (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Jose Ordonez-ZometaFourth Circuit· 2025-06-17· cited 6×
- United States v. Jose Ortega-AyalaFourth Circuit· 2025-06-17
- John Moretti v. Helga ThorsdottirFourth Circuit· 2025-10-15
- Laquita Oliver v. Navy Federal Credit UnionFourth Circuit· 2026-02-09
- Mario Lopez v. Pamela BondiFourth Circuit· 2026-02-13
- Baby Doe v. Joshua MastFourth Circuit· 2026-04-22
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 10,863×
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-02-26· cited 2,668×
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court· 2005-12-07· cited 2,624×
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 964×
- Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court· 1934-12-03· cited 590×
- Company Doe v. Public CitizenFourth Circuit· 2014-04-16· cited 484×
- John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedFourth Circuit· 1993-10-04· cited 455×
- John Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin and Aurora Health Care, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1997-04-29· cited 436×
- Ernest Sutton Bell v. Mack Jarvis Robert SmithFourth Circuit· 2000-12-29· cited 311×
- Jane Doe v. Jason SmithSeventh Circuit· 2005-11-21· cited 129×
- Mdk, Incorporated v. Mike's Train House, Incorporated, a Maryland Corporation, Lionel Trains, Incorporated, a Michigan CorporationFourth Circuit· 1994-06-22· cited 61×
- E.H. Reise v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemSeventh Circuit· 1992-02-12· cited 59×
- James J. Acosta, Sr. v. Tenneco Oil Company and Mobil Oil CorporationFifth Circuit· 1990-09-18· cited 56×
- Rux v. Republic of SudanFourth Circuit· 2006-09-01· cited 47×
- Diana Mey v. Judson PhillipsFourth Circuit· 2023-06-23· cited 44×
- Therl Taylor v. Virginia GrubbsFourth Circuit· 2019-07-18· cited 42×
- John Doe v. Robert Ayers, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2015-05-27· cited 34×
- John J. Donnelly v. Honorable Barrington D. ParkerD.C. Circuit· 1973-08-21· cited 31×
- Goodman v. Harris CountyFifth Circuit· 2006-03-21· cited 26×
- American Petroleum Institute v. Roy Cooper, IIIFourth Circuit· 2013-06-06· cited 11×
Other cases named Jane Doe v. Cenk Sidar
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.