· 9/18/1990
James J. Acosta, Sr. v. Tenneco Oil Company and Mobil Oil Corporation
Citations
- 913 F.2d 205
- 31 Fed. R. Serv. 354
- 17 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1436
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16420
- 54 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 31
- 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,287
- 1990 WL 133435
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Rule 35 order at issue “in the instant case” was appealable under the collateral order doctrine
- holding that the Rule 35 order at issue “in the instant case” was appealable under the collateral order doctrine
- “[Defendant] already has the information it seeks to pursue its . . . claim without a repetitive examination of its own.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Politz, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.