Michael Allen Bowen v. Ernest Roe, Warden California State Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that AEDPA’s one-year limitations period begins to run after ninety-day period for seeking writ of certiorari in Supreme Court expires
• holding that the period of direct review “includes the period within which a petitioner can file a petition for writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court”
• holding that “the period of ‘direct review’… includes the period within which a petitioner can file a petition for a writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court”
• holding that the “period of ‘direct review’… includes the period within which a petitioner can file a petition for a writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court”
• holding that AEDPA’s one-year limitations period begins to run on the date “when the period within which the prisoner can petition for a writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court expires.”
• holding that, when no petition for certiorari to the United States 10 Supreme Court is filed, direct review is considered to be final 90 days after the decision of 11 the state's highest court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).