Skip to main content

James v. State

Citations

  • 843 So. 2d 933
  • 2003 WL 1628252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the defendant failed to file a motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct, the alleged error was not preserved for appellate review
  • holding that the defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial based on juror misconduct where he failed to raise such claim at trial
  • holding that the defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial based on juror misconduct where he failed to raise such claim at trial
  • “Generally, juror misconduct issues arise where a juror conceals a material fact during voir dire.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.