Skip to main content

Cotto v. State

Citations

  • 141 So. 3d 615
  • 2014 WL 2480189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Witt analysis to a Rule 3.800(a) claim and holding that Miller v. Alabama 3 is a development of fundamental significance
  • “What Miller and Graham require is a sentencing scheme that allows the court to consider a juvenile’s suitability for rehabilitation and a possibility for release.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Damoorgian, Gerber, Gross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.