Roland v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying motion to interview juror when the allegations in the motion and affidavit established prima facie showing of juror misconduct and remanding for juror interview
• stating that the appropriate standard of review for a trial court's ruling on a motion to interview jurors is abuse of discretion
• finding that motion supported by sworn affidavit of third party indicating that alternate juror had a predisposition to find defendant guilty for matters unrelated to trial warranted juror interviews
• holding the trial court abused its discretion in denying motion to interview juror when allegations in motion and affidavit established prima facie showing of juror misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marshall v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-12· cited 52×
• Marshall v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-12-06· cited 12×
• Ramirez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-07· cited 11×
• James v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-26· cited 9×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-26· cited 6×
• Defrancisco v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-11· cited 3×
• Travelers Insurance Co. v. Jackson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-18· cited 3×
• Roberts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-03

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Russ v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1957-06-07· cited 74×
• Shere v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-04-04· cited 37×
• Sconyers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-10-16· cited 13×