Sixth Circuit· 2/16/2001

James E. McCurdy v. Montgomery County, Ohio

Citations

240 F.3d 512
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2326
2001 WL 127862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an officer violated the plaintiff's First Amendment rights where the arrest was based on the plaintiff's verbal challenge of \what the f* *k do you want?\
holding that an officer violated the plaintiffs First Amendment rights where the arrest was based on the plaintiffs verbal challenge of “what the f* *k do you want?”
holding that an officer violated a plaintiffs First Amendment rights when the arrest was based on the plaintiffs verbal challenge of “what the f* *k do you want?”
holding that an officer violated the plaintiff’s First Amendment rights where the arrest was based on the plaintiff’s verbal challenge of “what the f**k do you want?”
concluding that an officer lacked probable cause to arrest an individual for public intoxication in part because the officer testified \he could only 'speculate' on the 'one of a million things' that might occur if he did not arrest\ the suspect
finding that plaintiff’s “right to challenge verbally” officer’s conduct, including stating “what the fu*k do you want” and “what the fu*k is your job,” was “well-established”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Engel, Jones, Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.