Frank Barrett v. Nancy I. Harrington, A/K/A Penny Harrington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that acts of adjudication, including the rendering of judgments and orders, are judicial acts
• noting that based on its holding that the judge was entitled to absolute judicial immunity, the Court did not need to address the qualified immunity issues
• finding that acts protecting the integrity of the judicial process are adjudicatory in nature and therefore are subject to judicial immunity
• finding that acts protecting the integrity of the judicial process are adjudicatory in nature
• explaining that a district court has complete discretion to decide whether to consider materials beyond the pleadings and treat a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss as one for summary judgment under Rule 56
• stating that “recusal is undoubtedly an act that concerns judicial decision-making”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).