Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Sixth Circuit· 8/10/2010

United States v. Cecil

Citations

  • 615 F.3d 678
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16475
  • 2010 WL 3120027

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[F]ollowing Williams, we have consistently held that sudden unexplained wealth occurring after the commission of an offense is admissible evidence.” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)
  • affirming strike of juror with a husband in law enforcement where defendant was a former police officer
  • “[I]f the record is based on the statements of an informant rather than the first-hand observations of its author, the informant must also be acting under a business duty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Boggs, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Cecil

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.