Richard Orozco v. United Air Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that substantial injustice would not result from application of de novo, rather than arbitrary and capricious, standard of review to plan administrator’s benefits determination, and therefore that the third Chevron Oil factor was not met
• finding that substantial injustice would not result from application of de novo, rather than arbitrary and capricious, standard of review to plan administrator’s benefits determination, and therefore that the third Chevron Oil factor was not met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).